LEDN

Aligning Product, Compliance, and Operations to Unlock Business Growth

Timeline2 Months
RoleLead Product Designer (Initial Sole Designer)
TeamCustomer Experience, Legal, Compliance, Engineering
IndustryCrypocurrency
SkillsUX Strategy, Design Thinking, User Research, Prototyping

The Business Problem

Ledn's personal onboarding experience was efficient, but corporate onboarding remained manual, slow, and resource-intensive. Business accounts required extensive coordination between customer experience, legal, and compliance teams, resulting in long activation timelines and inconsistent user experiences.

As Ledn expanded its business and institutional offerings, this workflow became a constraint on growth. Scaling onboarding meant scaling people.

My Role

I led the redesign of corporate onboarding as the product designer on the initiative. I worked closely with customer experience, compliance, legal, and engineering to define requirements, align on risk boundaries, and translate regulatory complexity into a self-serve product experience.

My objective was to reduce operational load while preserving compliance, accuracy, and user trust.

Constraints

Stakeholder Realities

Corporate onboarding required detailed documentation, ownership disclosures, and jurisdiction-specific compliance checks. These requirements were non-negotiable and historically managed off-platform, creating delays, review bottlenecks, and limited visibility for users and internal teams.

Approach

The Product Strategy

I designed a guided, step-by-step onboarding flow that embedded compliance directly into the product experience.

Businesses progress through clearly defined stages: account type selection, company details, ownership disclosure, document submission, and compliance attestations. Requirements are introduced progressively, with contextual guidance and progress indicators to reduce uncertainty and drop-off.

The experience was designed to work seamlessly across desktop, tablet, and mobile.

01 — Account Type Selection
02 — Company Details
03 — Ownership Disclosure
04 — Document Submission
05 — Compliance Attestations

Product Design

Key Screens

Entry Point
Business account registration form

Business account registration — capturing essential information with a clean, trust-driven form

Onboarding Dashboard
Corporate onboarding dashboard with task progress

Step-by-step overview of all onboarding tasks with clear progress tracking

Beneficial Owners — Detail
Beneficial owners disclosure form

Ownership details and disclosure forms with clear validation cues

Document Submission
Document upload flows for corporate verification

Structured upload flows for articles of incorporation, partnership agreements, and corporate status documents

Compliance Checkpoint
Compliance confirmation before submission

Clear confirmation step before final submission ensures data accuracy

Completed State
Completed onboarding ready for compliance review

All steps completed — ready for compliance review with full visibility into submission status

Exploration

Before arriving at the final solution, I explored multiple structural approaches to understand how different patterns would serve both user needs and compliance requirements. These explorations were shared with stakeholders to align on the direction that best balanced usability, scalability, and regulatory needs.

Tab Variations

Account Type Selection: Side-by-Side Cards vs. Tabbed Navigation

I explored two patterns for distinguishing personal and corporate account paths. Side-by-side cards offered visual clarity and immediate comparison, while a tabbed interface reduced cognitive load by focusing attention on one path at a time. The tabbed approach was ultimately chosen for its cleaner information hierarchy.

Option A

Stacked Cards

Side-by-side account type cards
Two card layout gives equal visual weight to both account types

Option B — Chosen

Tabbed Navigation

Tabbed account type selection
Tabs focus attention on the selected account type, reducing visual noise

Forms vs. Step Format

Business Profile: Long-Form Input vs. Progressive Steps

A critical design decision was whether to present business information as a single long form or break it into progressive steps. The long form offered completeness at a glance but risked overwhelming users with 15+ fields. The stepped approach, chosen for the final design, introduced requirements progressively — reducing perceived complexity while maintaining data accuracy.

Option A

Single Long Form

Long-form business profile fields
All business fields visible at once — efficient but visually dense

Option B — Chosen

Progressive Steps

Progressive step business profile
Stepped disclosure reduces cognitive load and improves completion rates

Design Decision

The progressive step format was chosen because it reduced form abandonment, allowed contextual validation at each stage, and gave compliance teams predictable data structures for review. Each step maps directly to an internal review checkpoint, aligning the user experience with operational workflows.

Impact

Most importantly, Ledn could onboard corporate clients at higher volume without increasing operational headcount. The onboarding experience now reflects Ledn's premium, trust-driven brand while supporting growth.

Standardized

Inputs across all corporate onboarding, reducing back-and-forth with internal teams

Shortened

Onboarding cycles with more predictable compliance reviews

Scaled

Corporate client volume without increasing operational headcount